CORONA VIRUS / COVID-19 ADVISORY

Due to the health risks posed by the Corona Virus tragedy, our office is following the directives of the governor of California in order to minimize the risks to our staff, our clients and our community. Our office will continue to operate fully, as it has thus far, observing our normal schedule, Monday through Friday from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. We will continue to schedule appointments to meet with clients and will do this via ZOOM or Telephone only.

If you would like to schedule an appointment with any of our lawyers or staff members, please do so by calling our office at (619) 291-1112. You can also contact us via e-mail at [email protected]

Thank you for your understanding.

AVISO DE CORONA VIRUS / COVID-19

Debido a los riesgos para la salud planteados por la tragedia del Virus Corona, nuestra oficina está siguiendo las directivas del gobernador de California para minimizar los riesgos para nuestro personal, nuestros clientes y nuestra comunidad. Nuestra oficina seguirá funcionando a pleno, como lo ha hecho hasta ahora, cumpliendo con nuestro horario habitual, de lunes a viernes de 8:30 a.m. a 5:30 p.m. Continuaremos programando citas para reunirnos con los clientes y lo haremos solo a través de ZOOM o por teléfono.

Si desea programar una cita con alguno de nuestros abogados o miembros del personal, hágalo llamando a nuestra oficina al (619) 291-1112. También puede contactarnos por correo electrónico a [email protected]

Gracias por su comprensión.

Resolving Immigration Problems
In An Honest & Responsible Manner

Asylum may be granted based on fear of facing gang persecution

Generally, getting asylum requires an immigrant to prove that he would be persecuted by the government of his native country if deported back to it. A federal case out of another circuit, along with a few other cases, seems to indicate an expansion of that principle. In light of that case, California immigrants and those located elsewhere may be able to get asylum based on the fear of returning to private gang persecution.

The federal appellate court held that a 55-year-old immigrant may deserve asylum. It reversed the opposite conclusion by the Bureau of Immigration Appeals. It reasoned that the man could be considered a member of a gang-persecuted “social group” whose life, and his family’s life, would be endangered if they are deported to their country of origin.

Asylum requests regarding gang recriminations are usually unsuccessful. The decision from the 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, along with a few other rulings, may indicate an expansion to include street-gang persecution. An immigration law professor at the University of Minnesota indicates that the government’s policy on this issue is inconsistent with international human rights norms.

In the 8th Circuit case, an immigrant from Kenya got mistakenly involved with a ruthless gang and when his loyalty was questioned he was hung by his feet over a fire pit. He still bears the ankle scars from the ordeal. He and his family came here on visitor visas and later asked to stay. They were ordered deported in 2009, despite sexual assaults against a female relative in Kenya. The woman was willing to come here to testify to the dangers but the court said no, but the 8th Circuit has held that it was an abuse of discretion to deny that testimony.

In California and nationwide, asylum applicants must prove they’ll be persecuted if sent back because of their race, religion, nationality, political opinion or membership in a particular social group. They must also prove that the government in their home country is unable or unwilling to crack down or control, or in some cases is colluding with, the gang or entity that is threatening their lives. The Kenya case could turn out to be a test case in which the U.S. Supreme Court may choose to expand the interpretation of the asylum requirements.

Source: twincities.com, Ruben Rosario: Lakeville man’s asylum case has national implications, Ruben Rosario, Aug. 29, 2013

Archives

We are open Monday to Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and we accept Visa, MasterCard, Discover and American Express.

For our clients’ convenience we offer English and Spanish speaking services.

Trump administration now wants to replace properly trained and experienced asylum officers with Border Patrol officers with 5 weeks training to conduct credible fear interviews. Quality and justice once again sacrificed for speed by Trump.

Jóvenes DACA en peligro.
Los jóvenes que se han visto beneficiados con el programa DACA se podrán ver perjudicados si no renuevan su DACA antes del fallo de la corte suprema de la nación que será en junio de 2020.
Lo recomendable es que se renueve dicho permiso aún si el permiso vence despues de la fecha del fallo de la corte que sera en junio de 2020.