Due to the current situation related to Coronavirus, and the State of Emergency orders from the governor of California, our office will continue to work behind closed doors. We will not see any clients in person.
If you have any questions please address them to us via email to [email protected]
To the extent possible we will try to accommodate telephonic appointments or consultations but we ask that you request them via e-mail. Our telephone number, (619) 291-1112, will continue to operate to the extent that the situation permits, but any appointments must be scheduled through e-mail. 
Thank you for your understanding.

Debido a la situación actual relacionada con el Coronavirus, al grado que nos sea posible, nuestro personal seguirá trabajando a puerta cerrada, no se atenderá a nadie en persona. 
En caso de tener alguna duda o pregunta favor de hacerla por correo electrónico a [email protected]  
Trataremos de llevar a cabo consultas migratorias telefónicamente. Pedimos solicite cita telefónica mediante correo electrónico. Nuestro teléfono, (619) 291-1112, seguirá operando al grado que nos lo permita la situación actual, pero cualquier cita se agendará por correo electrónico.
Gracias por su comprensión

Resolving Immigration Problems
In An Honest & Responsible Manner

California woman’s citizenship and naturalization efforts denied

When someone is applying to be a United States citizen, they retain the right to express their views on war and other topics that might be seen by some as controversial. If they feel it is immoral or unethical to participate in a military effort, it should not affect their citizenship and naturalization efforts. For one California woman that is directly the opposite of what happened.

The woman recently filed a citizenship application. On it, she listed herself as a conscientious objector. This means she is unwilling, due to moral objections, to go to war for the United States if asked to do so. She said she has strong objections to war and the loss of human life it represents.

Someone attempting to obtain citizenship retains the right to express their opposition to war. They typically do so because they have objections based on the dictates of their religion. Moral and ethical reasons are also meant to be valid reasons to register for conscientious objector status. The woman’s application was turned down because immigration authorities felt that, since her views were based on secular beliefs rather than those held for religious reasons, her views were not valid.

The woman says she knows she has a very low probability of ever being called upon to bear arms but that fact is irrelevant. She said in a statement that accompanied her application that it would have been easier to just mark the box “yes” when asked about her willingness to go to war. She said to do so would have been a betrayal of the beliefs she’s held since she was very young.

Attorneys from a humanist association have added their talents to further the woman’s cause. They say to deny her citizenship and naturalization efforts for this reason is a direct contradiction of her constitutional rights. As she continues her battle for citizenship, immigrants in California and elsewhere will be watching to see how the case is resolved. For those who hold similar beliefs about war, the outcome could be life changing.

Source: Salon, Woman’s citizenship application rejected because she objects to war, isn’t religious, Katie McDonough, Feb. 28, 2014


We are open Monday to Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and we accept Visa, MasterCard, Discover and American Express.

For our clients’ convenience we offer English and Spanish speaking services.

Trump administration now wants to replace properly trained and experienced asylum officers with Border Patrol officers with 5 weeks training to conduct credible fear interviews. Quality and justice once again sacrificed for speed by Trump.

Jóvenes DACA en peligro.
Los jóvenes que se han visto beneficiados con el programa DACA se podrán ver perjudicados si no renuevan su DACA antes del fallo de la corte suprema de la nación que será en junio de 2020.
Lo recomendable es que se renueve dicho permiso aún si el permiso vence despues de la fecha del fallo de la corte que sera en junio de 2020.