Due to the current situation related to Coronavirus, and the State of Emergency orders from the governor of California, our office will continue to work behind closed doors. We will not see any clients in person.
If you have any questions please address them to us via email to [email protected]
To the extent possible we will try to accommodate telephonic appointments or consultations but we ask that you request them via e-mail. Our telephone number, (619) 291-1112, will continue to operate to the extent that the situation permits, but any appointments must be scheduled through e-mail. 
Thank you for your understanding.

Debido a la situación actual relacionada con el Coronavirus, al grado que nos sea posible, nuestro personal seguirá trabajando a puerta cerrada, no se atenderá a nadie en persona. 
En caso de tener alguna duda o pregunta favor de hacerla por correo electrónico a [email protected]  
Trataremos de llevar a cabo consultas migratorias telefónicamente. Pedimos solicite cita telefónica mediante correo electrónico. Nuestro teléfono, (619) 291-1112, seguirá operando al grado que nos lo permita la situación actual, pero cualquier cita se agendará por correo electrónico.
Gracias por su comprensión

Resolving Immigration Problems
In An Honest & Responsible Manner

9th Circuit appears ready to define relationships for travel ban

A three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has just been hearing oral arguments regarding the scope and applicability of President Trump’s ban on travel to the U.S. from six predominantly Muslim nations. In July, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the ban could not be applied to anyone with “a credible claim of a bona fide relationship with a person or entity in the United States.”

The administration interpreted that to mean that spouses, fiancés/fiancées, parents, children, siblings, and in-laws could come to the U.S. However, it left grandparents, grandchildren, uncles, aunts, nieces, nephews and cousins out, claiming the Supreme Court had not intended these relatives to be allowed in.

It also made a sweeping decision that the ban still excludes virtually all refugees, even those with agreements with a U.S.-based resettlement agency.

By the end of oral arguments on Monday, it appeared clear that the Ninth Circuit panel would expand the types of family members considered “bona fide.” It was not as clear what would happen to the refugees, according to the New York Times.

“How can the government take the position that a grandmother or grandfather or aunt or uncles of a child in the United States does not have a close familial relationship?” asked one of the judges.

Ban found unconstitutional by two courts; Supreme Court to consider case in October

The travel ban was originally issued in January and then revised in March. Then, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals found it unconstitutionally discriminatory. Next, the Ninth Circuit determined it was unlawful because it exceeded the president’s authority and lacked adequate justification.

In July, the Supreme Court issued the provisional ruling that restricted the ban to those without credible claims of bona fide relationships. It will only remain in force until the Ninth Circuit defines those terms. The high court will hear the case fully beginning Oct. 10, but it will probably be some time after that hearing before a ruling is issued.


We are open Monday to Friday, from 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and we accept Visa, MasterCard, Discover and American Express.

For our clients’ convenience we offer English and Spanish speaking services.

Trump administration now wants to replace properly trained and experienced asylum officers with Border Patrol officers with 5 weeks training to conduct credible fear interviews. Quality and justice once again sacrificed for speed by Trump.

Jóvenes DACA en peligro.
Los jóvenes que se han visto beneficiados con el programa DACA se podrán ver perjudicados si no renuevan su DACA antes del fallo de la corte suprema de la nación que será en junio de 2020.
Lo recomendable es que se renueve dicho permiso aún si el permiso vence despues de la fecha del fallo de la corte que sera en junio de 2020.